This is the second part of our discussion and the continuation of our discourse on the case between one young man who sued a lady and her parent to court. I hope that you have read part one as to follow and understand the case. If not, GO HERE to read part one.
We ended the part one on how the lady pulled out a small diary from her bag. It happened that unknown to the man, the lady had as well-kept a secret diary.
Regarding that diary, which the lady started keeping from day one that the man started to give her money, that diary contained records of every dime the man ever gave her but also contained the number of times, the time and place the man demanded and had $ex with her.
In other words, in her defense, the lady tendered the diary containing the record of date and the number of times and place the man demanded and had $ex with her.
The lady appealed to the judge to appoint a three-man panel to reconcile her own account and that of the man’s account.
According to the lady, she argued in her defense that the man $exually abused her. Her argument that the man $exually abused her in the sense that the man literally turned her to a $ex machine.
In her argument, she said that the man was fond of jumping on top of her any time he feels like to satisfy his $exual urge, not minding whether she was ready or in the mood for $ex or not.
The lady further argued that the man treated her as if she was his $ex slave, including coming to her father’s house and as well as her school hostel to demand and have $ex with her right on her school bed.
In other words, the lady argued that since prostitutes’ charged a certain amount of money, that she in turn was charging the man half of the amount prostitutes charged, for the number of times she satisfied the man $exually.
That is to say that, by her argument that she was claiming that the man was not given her any free money but that the man was only paying for the $exual satisfaction she was given to him any time and place.
The lady then argued that the man literally turned her into a $ex machine, worse than a prostitute in the sense that prostitutes have choices of whether to engage in $ex or not at a particular time.
But on her own, she had no choice as the man often dragged her to bed and jump on top of her to satisfy his $exual desires any time any day, whether she was ready for him or not.
The lady explained how the man started doing so right from the first day the man came to see her parents to promise and assure them that he will be taking care of her university education.
Furthermore, she argued that since the man had involved her parents as well, (her parents been present in the court that day) that the man equally owed her parents a certain amount of money as well, which she argued that the court should compel the man to pay them.
When asked to expatiate on the amount she was arguing that the man owed her parents; she argued that the amount was to pay for the man’s sacrilege he committed against her parents.
Speaking further, she argued that it was a sacrilege for the man to come to her father’s house to demand and have $ex with her even at the full knowledge of her parents.
The lady then explained that the very day the man visited her parents to assure them that he will be taking care of her university education, that very day, after his meeting with her parents, he entered her room.
The lady stated that after her parents allowed the man to come to her room, she said that she would never forget that day as it was the most bitter memory in her life.
According to her, it was the most bitter memory in her life in the sense that it was the starting point of her having to use $ex exchange to pay in return for every dime the man will ever spend on her.
According to her, it happened that the very moment that the man entered her room; he started to romancing her, fondling her breasts despite her protest that her parents was still sitting in the parlor.
However, the man vehemently ignored or overlooked that, saying that they understood and that it was either I satisfy him $exually or that he will back out in sponsoring my education.
In other words, the lady explained that the man demanded for $exual satisfaction as a condition for his accepting to sponsor her education. According to the lady, sensing that she had no choice, she accepted not knowing that it was only the beginning of his $exual abuse.
Allowing the man to have $ex with her for the first time on her bed in her father’s house while her parent was around to her was a great sacrilege.
That was to say that it was the man who introduce her to $ex as it was the man who had $ex with her for the first time and broke her virginity.
Losing her virginity to the man was not the issue, but what pained her most was remembering that she lost her virginity to a man she was not her husband and that it took place on her family bed in her father’s house while her parents were around, which to her was the worst insult and humiliation to her parents.
She said that each time she remembered it, she wept as to the level of insult and humiliation her parents had to endure in the hands of the man due to the result of their poverty, wondering why the man could not respect them.
This is the end of part two. Please keep a date with us as we will be looking at the continuation of the lady’s defense in part three. CLICK HERE to read part three.
